PROJECT CASE STUDY // TECHNICAL NARRATIVE

Self-Correcting Agent

Autonomous ReAct Web Research Agent with Self-Evaluation & Fallback Routing

YOUR ROLE & SCOPEAI Research Engineer
TIMELINE3 Weeks
CORE CONSTRAINTSPreventing infinite hallucination loops and API cost blowouts during web scraping
error_outline

1. THE PROBLEM

Autonomous LLM search agents often get stuck in repetitive loops or output unverified facts when web tools return noisy or conflicting search data.

architecture

2. TECHNICAL APPROACH & DECISIONS

1ReAct Loop with Critique Gate

✓ DECISION CHOSEN

Implemented a ReAct (Reasoning + Acting) execution loop paired with a secondary Reflection evaluator model that audits search results before synthesizing final answers.

✕ REJECTED ALTERNATIVE

Single-prompt linear LLM search call

Reflection loops detected hallucinated citations and forced the agent to execute refined query searches when initial search results were insufficient.

balance

3. TRADE-OFFS & HONEST REFLECTION

Self-evaluation loops double LLM API calls per research task, but increased output factual verification by over 80%.

task_alt

4. CONCRETE OUTCOME & METRICS

Delivered a resilient web research agent capable of self-correcting failed tool calls autonomously.

ReAct Loop + EvaluatorArchitecture
NVIDIA NIM & GroqLLM Providers
Explore Project Sources
Review live deployment or inspect codebase on GitHub.